My aunt, my mother’s older sister (may her soul rest in
peace) was fond of medicines. For self medication she had a thing for Abbott’s ‘Erythrocin’. Be it sniffles, scratchy throat, fever, cough
or a full blown cold; she would recommend the shocking pink pill. So much so that
in 1987, when my sister chose her wedding outfit, she explained the color to
everyone as ‘Erythrocin pink’. But even
my simple, old fashioned aunt
knew the limitations of the drug and when one of us complained of stomach ache or the runs, she knew that Buscopan and Imodium was a wiser choice. Being a simple housewife from the 60s through the 80s even she knew that medicines have a spectrum.
knew the limitations of the drug and when one of us complained of stomach ache or the runs, she knew that Buscopan and Imodium was a wiser choice. Being a simple housewife from the 60s through the 80s even she knew that medicines have a spectrum.
How is it then that the educated and the youth of Pakistan
cannot differentiate among the dynamics of being a national leader, a sports
team leader & a premium stake holder in a corporation?
In my opinion, leading a team to victory is absolutely
different from leading a nation to success. The former is simple. The best at
the game are chosen to form a team to win so everyone makes money. In the later,
choosing the best for the nation means nobody but the nation makes money … which
cannot be the preferred solution in Pakistan’s case.
In the former, if you are the best at the game and can make
the team win, everyone wants you and you have leverage. So if at any time,
things do not go your way, you can threaten to leave and that can force people
to see your point and comply. However, in the later, you do NOT have leverage unless your
diplomacy skills are ABSOLUTELY EXCELLENT and you have the talent to appease the
opposition as well as the allies. If such traits are absent then at any time
you threaten to leave (because things are not working as you’d like them to)
the vested interest might very well shake your hand and say ‘good bye, it was nice
while it lasted’.
In a sports team you try to choose the best players even if
they do not see eye to eye with you on political matters. They know the game,
they are good at it and they can win it for you. In national leadership, you
have no choice but to see eye to eye on issues with those who have followed
you.
Corporate structures are similar to running a government
only in the matter of having a board of directors (cabinet) of your cronies. Shaukat
Khanum has a board of directors comprising entirely of Imran Khan himself, his
siblings, his cousins and close friends.
Here’s what I have to say.
Imran Khan for cricket, GREAT! Strong player, stronger
captain, no diplomacy required because opposition will not be tolerated.
Imran Khan for Shaukat khanum GREAT! Very influential, tons of contacts and a board
of directors of those who’ll always be in agreement. Again, opposition will not be tolerated.
But Imran Khan as a national leader; a recipe for disaster!
The thesaurus interprets diplomacy as ‘politics’ and
politics as ‘government’. Imran khan sucks at diplomacy! So far he has declared
that there cannot be an oath taking with Zardari as president and cannot be a
political alliance with anyone obvious on the political horizon.
At the same time he flip flops between MQM the murderer and
MQM the natural ally, eats his words about Sheikh Rashid, thinks people will pay taxes because they are
good at charity, and that Taliban are an anomaly which will disappear with the
pull out of US and NATO forces. All of
this is not only wishful thinking, it suggest a clear lack of political
understanding.
He is in denial of the
non existence of an infrastructure, clueless about public behavior and
obviously doesn't know the difference between a kingdom and a democracy. Sadly, neither do his emotional followers.
For him to think that once in power (as he mentioned in his
interviews) he will have the last word, is absolutely undemocratic (besides
being pompously ridiculous).
Politics by definition is about larger groups. Political
thought, therefore has to be a medley of various thoughts and a political
leader has to be a leader who understands and can project himself as a leader
of various schools of thought. Imran Khan’s only school of thought is Imran Khan. PTI’s
only school of thought is Imran Khan. That is not a wide enough spectrum.
PS. Did I just suggest a coalition? I think I did. Sometimes
you have to use Penadol AND Imodium together, and also follow a restricted diet
plan.
No comments:
Post a Comment
What you write is what you think and what you think is who you are.